![]() This tool is designed to drive wood and sheet-metal screws, but it can also turn a bolt or drill a hole using the appropriate impact-rated bits. ![]() ![]() Best in Tight Spaces: Milwaukee M12 Fuel SurgeĪ dedicated impact driver, unlike a drill-driver, has a spring-loaded, quick-release chuck that accepts 1⁄4-inch hex-shank driver bits.Best on a Budget: Hart 20-Volt Impact Driver Kit.Best for Serious DIYers: Kobalt XTR Max.Best Value: Ryobi One+ HP Drill and Impact Driver Set.Take a look at quick info on the top impact drivers from our testing, then scroll down for buying advice and in-depth reviews. One can make myriad tasks easier, such as building decks, screwing down plywood, installing tile backer board, or any other job that requires driving long screws into wood. And that’s good, but we’d argue for also investing in a dedicated impact driver. Its length is just 5.00″ and it’s only 7.69″ tall, making it the 3rd smallest overall.One of the first power tools people buy is usually a cordless drill-driver due to its versatility. Milwaukee’s Gen 3 M18 Fuel Impact Driver already has one of the most compact designs available, but the Milwaukee 2850 is no slouch in that department. If you’re the type of Pro that leaves your impact driver in high and feathers the trigger for smaller screws, this feature set is just fine. It has a single-speed brushless motor, LED light, and reversible belt hook. If the drill’s feature set is light, the impact driver’s is even lighter. While the M18 Fuel model consistently broke 3600 ft-lbs, the Milwaukee 2850 broke 4500 in-lbs. But what’s really impressive is how hard it hits in reverse. The Gen 3 M18 Fuel had the highest at 2656 in-lbs. It gives you enough speed and torque to drive smaller fasteners up to 1/4″ or so without getting to the point that you break socket adapters every time you work on a hex fastener.įor fastening torque, we saw a solid 2088 in-lbs average. Milwaukee specs this model at 1600 in-lbs of torque and we really think that’s the sweet spot for impact drivers. However, it does give us a repeatable test for making comparisons. That’s plenty of speed with a fastener and the motor doesn’t feel like it’s in danger of overheating or stalling.īefore we go into torque, it’s important to note that the values we record do not reflect the manufacturer’s testing for specs. Milwaukee M18 Compact Brushless Impact Driver Performanceĭriving 1/4″ ledger screws, the Milwaukee Compact Brushless Impact Driver averages 450 RPM, just 30 RPM slower than the Gen 3 M18 Fuel model. Power Source: Milwaukee M18 RedLithium batteries.Milwaukee M18 Compact Brushless Drill Driver Specifications That said, the Gen 3 M18 Fuel drill and hammer drill models are really compact in their own right. Having a lighter weight and compact footprint makes this a really pleasant drill to use. That’s also an impressive feat, with just the two sub-compacts and Skil’s compact model weighing less. Aside from the two sub-compact drills we tested, it’s the most compact in the 18V Compact class.īare, it’s 2.45 pounds and 3.43 pounds with a 2.0 Ah battery on our scale. We measured the Milwaukee M18 Compact Brushless Drill Driver at 7.78″ tall and 6.63″ long. It’s basic, but it’s functional and it’s all you really need to effectively make holes and drive fasteners. The Milwaukee 2801 drill driver has a 2-speed brushless motor with an 18+1 clutch, a full-metal chuck, LED light, and a reversible belt hook. Feature Setįor both tools in this combo kit, the feature set is pretty basic. Seven other compact drills are also in the 120 in-lbs – 130 in-lbs range. I don’t have a solid answer for why it’s lower, but Milwaukee isn’t alone here. Soft torque usually runs 50% – 60% of the hard torque, so we expected it to be closer to 250 in-lbs. In this test, Milwaukee only averages 121 in-lbs. Check out our best cordless drill article for more testing details. It’s important to note that our torque test is a soft torque test. ![]() ![]() We’re confident that you can handle anything that other compact drills can. While there are some drills that have higher percentages, what this shows us is that the motor isn’t struggling to keep these bits moving. Perhaps the bigger takeaway is in the efficiency-its percentage of no-load speed. However, it’s in the top 5 in the low-speed test. In the high-speed test, Milwaukee is near the bottom. With the self-feed bit in low speed, it averages 408 RPM which is 73% of its 556 RPM no-load speed. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |